Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Peter: Here's your original: http://www.2alpha.net/~pklein/oldpics/bighorn_blue.jpg Here's the one which I sent to you last night http://www.hemenway.com/for_peter/not-so-blue.jpg All I did was a little color balance, less blue and a little more red... but it was late and I can't remember the amounts. You replied... >>> It is indeed better, Jim. In fact the fur colors are more vivid than the actually were. But there's still blue stuff adjacent to the white fur, and in the places where the winter fur has been shed. I've read that the LS-2000 suffers from blue "bloom" when you have dark things next to light things. There is a tiny hint of blue in the original slide, but *nothing* like the way it comes out in a scan. What did you do to get the fur nicer? <<<<<<< Here's a 2nd try which I just did a little while ago: http://www.hemenway.com/for_peter/2nd-try-bighorn_blue.jpg I desaturated the blue by -95 and in color balance I added +25, Then I added +10 contrast. All done in Photoshop but I would guess that you would have those types of controls in your software Do you like this any better? I might have given it too much contrast with the +10... but, I think that the blue is gone, at least it is on my monitor. Try playing with the sliders in your software and the "levels" if you're feeling adventurous. - ------------- Peter Klein wrote: > > Now that you've looked at my wildlife shot... > > http://www.2alpha.net/~pklein/oldpics/bighorn_bw.htm > > ...I must reveal that it's actually a Kodachrome 25 slide. But in color, > somehow it scans with purple and blue junk on the animals no matter what I > do. I guess this is an example of what Tony Sleep (filmscanners list > moderator) calls an "UtterBastard Kodachrome." > > Here's a smaller color version with some overall color cast correction > applied, but there's still blue and purple near the highlights in some dark > areas of the hair. > > http://www.2alpha.net/~pklein/oldpics/bighorn_blue.jpg > > If I eliminate all the blue stuff with overall color cast correction, the > whole thing turns very yellow. So next I've done some correcting of the > individual shades of blue. > > http://www.2alpha.net/~pklein/oldpics/bighorn_cc.jpg > > This gets better, but there's still some hints of blue in the dark > fur. Much more than this, and it looks very artificial. > > Nikon LS-2000, Vuescan and Picture Window Pro. If anyone has suggestions > on how to deal with these "blues," I'd love to hear them. The lighting was > very difficult, semi-overcast day with occasional sun breaks, so there was > blue sky, reflecting clouds, high contrast, yatta yatta yatta. > > I know that this picture can be printed well in color, because I've got a > nice 8x10 of it hanging in my office. The print was done by a local custom > lab. > > --Peter Klein > Seattle, WA > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html