Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Tele-Elmarit
From: "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@home.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 08:13:11 -0700
References: <B85D3E28.17F83%jbcollier@powersurfr.com> <3.0.5.32.20020106221757.00ab8bf0@pacific.net.sg>

Hi Dan... does this have anything to do with the version..... at
Cameraquest, Steve  Gandy list 4-5 "versions"...? Steve
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "D Khong" <dkhong@pacific.net.sg>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>;
<leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 7:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Tele-Elmarit


> If I may add, I used a thin TE and also the current 90/2.8 with the built
> in hood. Both flared; the thin TE was worse inspite of a shade. This is a
> common experience with many of my contacts who have used them. If anybody
> has one that does not flare, it's a gem and a keeper.
>
> Dan K.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>            Ultimately...only men of character are trusted.
> =======================================================================
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from John Collier <jbcollier@powersurfr.com> (Re: [Leica] Tele-Elmarit)
Message from D Khong <dkhong@pacific.net.sg> (Re: [Leica] Tele-Elmarit)