RE: [Leica] Was there Ever ...

["Jeffery Smith" <jsmith45@bellsouth.net>]

I have gotten decent results with Kodak print films, and they make sense
from an economic standpoint. I have always had a bias against Kodak from the
notion that they penny-pinch to the detriment of the consumer. But for
someone just learning photography, my advice will be to get the cheaper of
the two (Kodak or Fuji) until you know that you are doing well enough to
justify making the film a major concern.

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of John
> Collier
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:58 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Was there Ever ...
>
>
> I use the Portra films as my C-41 of choice. I also use Tri-X as
> my only B&W
> film. I do use Fuji Provia for my chromes but I would use Kodachrome if I
> could get decent (under two weeks) processing turn around.
>
> > From: "Gerhard Paulman" <gerhardp@inch.com>
> >
> > I have the feeling, that in general our fellow lugers don't
> like Kodak films
> > that much.  Maybe it's a case of the grass always being greener
> on the other
> > side.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html