Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Robert Stevens' PAW Wk 2
From: "Robert G. Stevens" <robsteve@hfx.andara.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 16:00:28 -0400
References: <g4p54u4f4mc0rep9ka59892vi5b7r9goim@4ax.com>

Kim:

The tonality is the Leica lenses ;-)  Nothing special about the 
processing.  I do it myself in a Jobo and use the Kodak recommended times 
for processing in small tanks rather than rotary tube.  I use an ATL-1000 
which does a five minute pre-wet as part of the program.  With the prewet, 
Kodaks rotary tube times give thin negatives, so I use their small tank 
times instead as suggested by another LUG member.

I use Xtol at 1:1 for 8:47 at 20 degrees  celcius.

Regards,

Robert


At 11:15 AM 1/14/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>I agree with Eric, Robert.
>These are two very nice images.  Did you process the TMAX yourself or did a
>lab do it.  The tonality is quite nice.
>kim
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Eric
>Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:03 AM
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: [Leica] Re: Robert Stevens' PAW Wk 2
>
>Robert:
>
> >http://home.istar.ca/~robsteve/photography/PAW2001/wk2.htm
> >http://home.istar.ca/~robsteve/photography/PAW2001/wk2alt.htm
>
>Both are wonderful images.  Not sure I'd change anything.  If I were looking
>for something to criticize, I'd suggest changing the alternate so that it
>contains some maximum black.  Pretty darn close already, though!
>
>
>Eric
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> ([Leica] Re: Robert Stevens' PAW Wk 2)