Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Is the 50 Summilux-M the poor cousin?
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:45:45 -0800
References: <20020110032712.57507.qmail@web9106.mail.yahoo.com>

Ray Moth wrote:
> 
> Thanks for your responses to this question; you've satisfied my
> curiosity! The consensus seems to be that the 50 Summilux-M is a very
> respectable lens but that it doesn't attract much comment these days
> because it's been around, relatively unchanged, for so many years.
> 


The made it focus closer. That's a big change!


Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.markrabiner.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Ray Moth <ray_moth@yahoo.com> ([Leica] Re: Is the 50 Summilux-M the poor cousin?)