Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I would concur with that advice. I've found the tonality of the 400 pushed to be less brittle, for want of a better term, than that of the 1600. Slobodan Dimitrov Pablo Kolodny wrote: > > Hi Don, > > let me suggest you to keep away from Neopan 1600. > I'd prefer you to push any 400 ASA film up to 1600 with better results. > Try it! then tell us what you think. > > -- > Pablo Kolodny > www.pablokolodny.com > > > From: "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> > > Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 19:43:03 -0500 > > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > > Subject: [Leica] corrected curves for Sharise/photo.net > > > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=544472 > > > > This is an adjusted image to withstand the photo.net image processor. For > > John you can see detail in Sharise's hair now that I have brought the d-max > > down on the file to adjust for d-max gain. > > > > Don Dory > > dorysrus@mindspring.com > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html