Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks, Allan, I tried that and came up blank again. The NYT archive has a rudimentary search engine that only goes back to 1996. So after failing there I searched the NYT in Lexis-Nexis where the full text archive goes back to 1980. This is the search I did: starbucks /50 gay! or lesbian! or homosexual! /50 protest! or critic! or boycott! Zero hits, even when I widened the search. If I take out the gay angle, I got 62 hits and if I take out the protests and boycotts I get a few articles but nothing unfriendly to Starbucks. I'm afraid I think that if the NYT had reported what you said, I would have found it by now. There was one article about a boycott of Starbucks last June after an African-American man in Seattle was shot by police. There was no gay angle, but it did talk about how confused the company was because it had nothing to do with the shooting. That's pretty much the point you were making. Are you perhaps thinking of that? Regards Simon >Yes, it is surprising, which is why I mentioned it. I read it in a NYT's >article, so you might want to do a search at their site. >On Monday, January 28, 2002, at 10:24 PM, Simon Stevens wrote: >>> Starbucks has been boycotted and protested against by everyone from >>> organic farmers to homosexual groups because they have deep pockets. >> >> Allan: >> >> Of all corporations this surprises me. Do you know which gay groups and >> why? I did a quick search on Lexis and could find nothing on this. No Archive - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html