Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Tri-Elmar
From: "Ernest Nitka" <enitka@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:29:23 -0500

Yes - it's a great lens.  I have the newer and this is great - very compact
with more positive detent for the three focal lengths.  The polarizer setup
is nicer - a 67 mm filter fitting into a special filter holder much like a
severly vented lens hood allowing you to look thru the polarizer while
turning it.  The f/4 is an obstacle but if one like provia 400 and Delta
3200 you might get away with it.  The Tri-elmar and 90 TE would be the only
two lenses needed. The Trielmar at f/4 is perfect on the Hexar RF by the
way.  Just my thoughts

ernie

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Bill
Satterfield
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:21 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Tri-Elmar


Robert, the review  I read said the 3E 28-35-50 focal lengths were as
good as any of the individual fixed focal lengths. in thought it was
Putt's review. The consensus on the LUG seemed to agree, in prior
postings. All positives.

Robert G. Stevens wrote:

> Bill:
>
> I like the idea of the Tri-Elmar, but I use the M for the fast lenses
> and the incredible quality of the images produced.  If you read
> Erwin's report he says the Tri-Elmar is not up to the level of the
> current lenses.  I just love the look of the images from the 35mm
> Summicron ASPH and the 50mm Summicron.  I almost never use a 28mm even
> on my R8, so the Tri-Elmar are the wrong three for me.  Perhaps if it
> was 35-50-70 and a touch faster.
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert
>
>
>
> At 09:13 AM 2/4/2002 -0600, Bill Satterfield wrote:
>
>> One more thought. Since I took my trip, I bought a  3E but the f/4
>> would be a limitation in the museums where you will need at least a
>> f/2. The 3E might work, I do not know. The 3E would be great for
>> outside scenes.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html