Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Kyle's PAW 8
From: "Robert G. Stevens" <robsteve@hfx.andara.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 22:10:38 -0400

Kyle:

The lighting on the second shot is terrible. It is too flat.  Time to  look 
at some lighting ratios.  The first shot is still a little flat, but 
works.  The second shot needs more dramatic lighting.

Regards,

Robert



At 05:48 PM 2/26/2002 -0500, Kyle Cassidy wrote:
>like anybody cares, but week 8 is up and it's back to old stuff...
>
>  http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/cassidy/pix/paw/2002/8/index.html
>
>so i'm left to wonder -- when is it an idiom and when is it a rut? ya shoot
>the things ya shoot -- for some reason it feels right, but that doesn't
>necessarily make it right. time passes, stacks of negatives accumulate and
>what are you left with? sometimes it's linguini, other times it's garbage.
>
>kc
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Robert G. Stevens" <robsteve@hfx.andara.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Kyle's PAW 8)
Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Kyle's PAW 8)