Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] The law of Supply and Demand in Reverse
From: "Ernest Nitka" <enitka@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 14:12:56 -0500

A nice user 135 for the rare times when I only need 135- have some pics done
with it that are nice esp. if not wide open.

ernie

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Andrew
Schroter
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 4:40 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] The law of Supply and Demand in Reverse


Well, what did it buy you? :-)
AGS
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ernest Nitka" <enitka@twcny.rr.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:25 AM
Subject: [Leica] The law of Supply and Demand in Reverse


> Somebody's comment got me to thinking that in my lens closet I have the
> reverse of S & D - I have more damn 90 mm lenses and yet I rarely walk
> around with one on my camera.  I have really only 1 or 2 lenses in the 50
to
> 35 range and only one 21 yet these are the focal lengths that I typically
> use.  The law breaks down and reverts to 'normal' at 135 where THE only
135
> I have is the Hektor 4.5 which I paid $79 for - mostly to see what $79 in
a
> Leica product would buy me.
>
> Ernie
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] The law of Supply and Demand in Reverse)