Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] A Second Body
From: "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 22:29:02 -0500
References: <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNEELBILAA.red735i@earthlink.net>

I usually put fast film in the M4 and slow film in the IIIf and take
whichever one fits the light I'm going to be in.

Mike D

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net>
To: "Leica-Users-Group" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:14 AM
Subject: [Leica] A Second Body


> I was wondering what might be the LUG's (multiple) opinion about choice of
a
> second body, if you carry around 2 bodies....  For the sake of clarity,
> please note your primary body as well.  For those with many bodies (
> multiple Leica disorder?), I suggest you state your combinations of bodies
> that you use...
>
> Examples:
> M2 + IIIC
> M6TTL .85  + M2
> M6 .72 + CL
> M3 + Bessa L
>
> Or whatever you like...
>
> My personal choice is 1 body... a M6TTL .72... 2 bodies is too much for my
> tourist style...
>
> Frank Filippone
> red735i@earthlink.net
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net> ([Leica] A Second Body)