Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: RE: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless
From: Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 08:24:38 -0800
References: <310B62141943D111845E00600808E14E02400569@EXCHANGE>
 
> If I was Brian, I would require real names.  The price of admission
> in my mind.

Utterly unenforceable. I know one case in which a person has participated in the LUG under at least 5 names, and I don't think that any of those is actually his real name.

Anybody know what "B.D." stands for?
(Anybody care? I don't).

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies: Reply from Jim Hemenway <jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless)
 In reply to: Message from BOB KRAMER <BobKramer@COOPERCARRY.com> (RE: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless)