Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless
From: "geebeespaw" <geebeespaw@btopenworld.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:17:23 -0000
References: <20020308204134.1128.qmail@web21303.mail.yahoo.com>

photophreak posteth thus:


>     Judge me by the content of what I post, not by your own
> imaginations.
> 
>      Look back over the past few weeks since I have joined.
> 
>      Have I slandered anyone ?  Or have I held anyone up
> for ridicule ?
> 
>     i think there was a parable about someone casting the
> first stone......
> 
Blimey! He's back! Pick 12 from the LUG and we'll all get in behind you.
Ps we have several Marks and a few Johns if you want continuity.


Graham
http://geebeephoto.com


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "geebeespaw" <geebeespaw@btopenworld.com> (Re: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless)
In reply to: Message from Photo Phreak <leicam4pro@yahoo.com> (RE: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless)