Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2002/03/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] what's the difference?
From: "Will" <wlarsen@ocsnet.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:08:42 -0800
References: <5.0.2.1.0.20020131211919.02e3a008@mail.chroniclenetworks.com> <002b01c1a9ce$7b9da290$ad466cd8@TELLURIUM> <20020130183526.22560.qmail@web9503.mail.yahoo.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020130155711.03959e88@pop.alink.net> <5.0.2.1.0.20020131211919.02e3a008@mail.chroniclenetworks.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020201095144.0395e510@pop.alink.net> <3C8E91F0.4A8F46DB@d2.com> <000d01c1ca23$341f09c0$78c20a44@hr.cox.net> <3C8E9E37.600B1E73@d2.com>
The film base on the 35mm film is the same. The ASA is also
the same. The 120/220 and sheet film have the 320 ASA and a
thicker acetate base. ref: select the tri-x at
http://www.kodak.com/cgi-bin/webAlphPrListing.pl?letter=T
Many people will shoot the 35mm film at ASA 320.
Hope this helps, Bill Larsen
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from "Michael Gardner" <mlgardner99@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] what's the difference?)
In reply to:
Message from Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com> ([Leica] what's the difference?)
Message from "Andrew Touchon" <atouchon@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] what's the difference?)
Message from Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com> (Re: [Leica] what's the difference?)