Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] 135/3.4 APO Telyt vs 135/2.8 Elmarit
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:45:17 -0500

And if I'm just out wandering around I'll usually just carry an M with a 28
or 35 - not a bag and an assortment of lenses. But different strokes
for...;-)

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Paul
Chefurka
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:14 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] 135/3.4 APO Telyt vs 135/2.8 Elmarit


On Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:51:50 -0500, "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
wrote:

>Soooooo - if one is happy framing and focusing an image about the size of
>the price on a postage stamp, the 135 APO is the way to go. If, on the
other
>hand, one wants to really see what one is shooting with a 135, an SLR may
>make a lot more sense than the 135 APO - and one can get a good SLR and a
>terrific 135 for less than one will pay for the 135 APO.
>
>Just a thought.
>
>B. D.

And if one doesn't want to carry two different systems just to have a long
lens available, an M6 .85 with the magnifier works like a charm with the
135.  I've got a wonderful 180 in my Nikon system, but if I'm out with the
Leica (as is usually the case) I'm damned if I want to carry the F3 and the
180 "just in case".  Much easier to slip the 135 and the magnifier into the
bag.

Paul

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html