Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Cron vs Lux
From: "Karina Klaas" <shutterbug@iinet.net.au>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 09:29:16 +1000
References: <MBBBJHIBKCKEAEOKKBPOEEHPDFAA.bdcolen@earthlink.net> <005201c1e26e$7f15ce60$30a03bcb@pavilion> <00b901c1e28a$27855be0$6401a8c0@oemcomputer>

Thanks, Don.
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Cron vs Lux


> Karina, the optical differences in the ASPH are just not worth worrying
> about.  You pays your money and you get more speed(and a few grams more
> weight).  Or, if you don't need biting sharpness, the last generation
prior
> to the ASPH was a very nice combination of size, image quality, and price.
>
> My personal recommendation is to pay for the Summilux.  Whereas the Noct
has
> a "look" at F1 to F2 you would be amazed at what a sharp lens can do at
1.4:
> the creative potential of sharp and no depth of field is wonderful.
>
> Don
> dorysrus@mindspring.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Re: The Word of the Lord)
Message from "Karina Klaas" <shutterbug@iinet.net.au> (Re: [Leica] Re: Cron vs Lux)
Message from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Cron vs Lux)