Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: Vs: [Leica] Digital vs Film
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:04:19 -0400

So stick with film for as long as you can...which, in the grand scheme of
things, won't be very long. ;-)

B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Mark
Kronquist
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 4:30 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: Vs: [Leica] Digital vs Film


No digital camera gives me the mind blowing color saturation, the variety of
views/perspectives, the ability to make a billboard (which I have on
occasion had to do without shooting for a billboard in mind), the
flexibility of emulsions and effects or the quality (by ANY measure) as a
film based camera.

I am on my fifth or sixth digital camera. They are amazingly convenient.  A
perfect replacement for 35mm point and Shoots.  But

When I have to shoot for a client (we are an advertising agency) with the
exception of comps, iPIX tours and really low end quick and dirty jobs we
use film.

When my wife and I travel to some off beat locations, we choose mechanical
(Leica M or R6 or Nikon FM/FM2/F/F2 or Hasselblad) cameras...

My 2 cents...


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from David Rodgers <davrod@worldnet.att.net> (RE: Vs: [Leica] Digital vs Film)
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (RE: Vs: [Leica] Digital vs Film)