Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Disqualified on a technicality and notta
From: Allan Wafkowski <allan@sohogurus.net>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 00:45:00 -0400

Graham, I like these (this and the one in the other message) a lot. I 
like your approach just as it is. I wouldn't like them taken without the 
knowledge of the subjects. There is a forced interaction that requires 
the subject to put forth something of themselves. You could plop a big 
coffee table book of these in front of me, and I'd love it.

Allan


geebeespaw wrote:
> Approached this guy, got his name, filled the frame but not in the 
> street so
> he doesn't qualify, these rules are too tight. I can't afford to lose
> characters like this.
>
> http://www.geebeephoto.com/html/fav_13.html
>
> BTW re the notta thread, I drive a truck. My career, I use the term in 
> its
> loosest possible sense, will not fund my hobby so I use credit. The
> rationale for that? We could get nuked tomorrow and I would hate to die
> under such circumstances with room on my credit card. A four minute 
> warning
> wont give me time to get to the shops. Pre LUG I never even met someone
> who new someone who had a Leica.
>
> Graham
> http://geebeephoto.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html