Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: charlie's leicaflex lust (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Notta L, D, IC)
From: Charles Walden <charlie@highhill.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 08:43:41 -0400
References: <Springmail.0994.1020963031.0.81927700@webmail.pas.earthlink.net> <009901c1f780$ee2262b0$2f0010ac@longitude.com> <005301c1f7d1$442fe6a0$6501a8c0@oemcomputer>

A good point, however I'd ideally like to avoid having to take lenses off
and on - I use my dual range summicron a fair bit and I'm always leaving the
goggles somewhere.  But saving the money is appealing and I don't really
anticipate going any smaller than 1/4 size.  As always I suppose,
conveneince costs a bit extra...

charlie
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: charlie's leicaflex lust (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Notta L, D, IC)


> Not to cause too much trouble but if you are not doing anything closer
than
> 1/4 life size then look at a 50 Summicron and the Leitz Elpro close up
> lenses.  Optically you can do very well and save a bundle.  The trick is
to
> know whether you go beyond about 1/4 life size.
>
> Don
> dorysrus@mindspring.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Douglas Herr<telyt@earthlink.net> (charlie's leicaflex lust (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Notta L, D, IC))
Message from "charles walden" <charlie@highhill.com> (Re: charlie's leicaflex lust (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Notta L, D, IC))
Message from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> (Re: charlie's leicaflex lust (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Notta L, D, IC))