Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RE: [Fwd: scanner]
From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 16:29:21 -0700
References: <3CF7DBEF.888E5B51@earthlink.net>

I would guess, detail in deep shadows or dark subjects. Leica lenses are 
notorious for recording a scene's deepest darkest secrets. And consumer 
scanners have no way of recording this.

IMHO,

:)

Jim


At 06:42 PM 5/31/2002 -0400, Austin Franklin wrote:

> > As far as I'm concerned there is nothing compatible with what I get from
> > my Leica optics, even as close as some other product might come. That
> > missing 5-10% from brand X is glaring, and unacceptable.
> > Slobodan Dimitrov
>
>Slobodan,
>
>WHAT do you believe is missing?  What SPECIFIC aspect of a scanner is not
>sufficient for your images?  I am looking for a specific technical aspect
>that you claim a current midrange+ scanner doesn't "get" from your Leica
>images.
>
>Austin

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] RE: RE: [Fwd: scanner])
Reply from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] RE: RE: [Fwd: scanner])
Reply from S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] RE: [Fwd: scanner])
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (RE: [Leica] RE: [Fwd: scanner])
In reply to: Message from S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] [Fwd: scanner])