Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jim, Much to my surprise, you're absolutely wrong! If you are talking negative film, there is not one commercial film scanner that can not get every last ounce of detail out of the negative. If you are talking slide film, then any newer decent scanner can get it. I'll bet anyone here $1000 that they can't give me a negative (normal film that is) I can't scan with my Leafscan 45 and get as much or more out of it than they can with chemical printing. Just have your money ready ;-) Fact is, I have taken quite a few people's film and scanned it for them and given them FAR better tonal range and tonality using my scanner and Piezo printing than they were ever able to get in the darkroom. And these were very experienced people in the darkroom. Regards, Austin > I would guess, detail in deep shadows or dark subjects. Leica lenses are > notorious for recording a scene's deepest darkest secrets. And consumer > scanners have no way of recording this. > > IMHO, > > :) > > Jim > > > At 06:42 PM 5/31/2002 -0400, Austin Franklin wrote: > > > > As far as I'm concerned there is nothing compatible with what > I get from > > > my Leica optics, even as close as some other product might come. That > > > missing 5-10% from brand X is glaring, and unacceptable. > > > Slobodan Dimitrov > > > >Slobodan, > > > >WHAT do you believe is missing? What SPECIFIC aspect of a scanner is not > >sufficient for your images? I am looking for a specific technical aspect > >that you claim a current midrange+ scanner doesn't "get" from your Leica > >images. > > > >Austin - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html