Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] C41 -- The new Supra films versus Royal Gold and Fuji???
From: "Christopher Williams" <LeicaChris@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 21:52:26 -0500
References: <15a.eb129da.2a2b9efd@aol.com>

Kodak brought out Supra film for best results when scanning. Supra comes in
100,400, and 800 ASA. I thought this was going to be a replacement for Royal
Gold since there had not been any recent changes for the Royal line. Well,
now there is a new Royal 200 and 400 coming out.

Supra seems to be stuck in the middle. How many different color print film
does Kodak need? My guess is many since Fuji still is way ahead in the color
film department.

Supra ain't what Kodak says it is. It's grainy, not sharp, and not even
close to the Fuji film line.

Keep the Leica stocked with Fuji.

Chris Williams
New Orleans



- ----- Original Message -----
From: <ALEXSCIFI@aol.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Subject: [Leica] C41 -- The new Supra films versus Royal Gold and Fuji???


> Does anyone know how the relatively new Supra films compare to their Fuji
> counterparts--Supra 100 versus Royal Gold 100, Fuji Reala and Superia 100?
> Then Supra 400 versus Royal Gold 400 versus Superia 400? And lastly, Supra
> 800 versus Royal Gold 1000(?) versus Fuji Superia 800, NHGII and the new
NPZ?
>
> I have found few reports on Supra!
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Alex


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from ALEXSCIFI@aol.com ([Leica] C41 -- The new Supra films versus Royal Gold and Fuji???)