Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]What are we thinking is a better size for critique? I was thinking 384 pixels on the vertical dimensions fits it onto screens with 640x480 resolution, but larger than that makes some people scroll to see the full size. My own monitor is 1280x1024, but what is standard these days. Thanks to all for the comments. Tom - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zeissler, Mitch" <mzeissle@gannett.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 8:34 AM Subject: RE: [Leica] critique > Needs to be quite a bit bigger to see any detail for critiquing > purposes. > > /Mitch Zeissler > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Smart [mailto:tom@sleepytom.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:38 PM > To: LUG > Subject: [Leica] critique > > > I don't have a home on my web site yet for a PAW, but I'll post an image > for critique here. Would like to hear your feedback. > > http://www.sleepytom.com/PAW/untitled-5.jpg > > Thanks, > > Tom > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html