Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, BeeDee...you are right about the individual purposes and usage. Dan At 09:20 AM 7/31/02 -0400, you wrote: >Hi, Dan. I think what you meant to say below was..."The Ilford film is much >superior for MY purposes.";-) > >Because I've used both and I know that Tri-X is definitely the superior >film - for MY purposes. ;-) > >B. D. >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of D Khong >Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:41 AM >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: Re: [Leica] Kodak Tri-X and Tecnical Pan > > >Eberhard Gronau >wrote: > >Hi out there, > >Kodak shocked me recently with their new black and white fact sheet, which > >lists all bw films available. Tri-x and Tec Pan are missing. This list has > >been published in germany. Does anybody know about deleting those two from > >the list. > >It would be painful to me, because I do most of my bw work with trix and >tec > >pan. > >I used to use Tri-X. Then I changed to Ilford HP5+. The Ilford one is a >much superior film compared to Tri-X. > >Dan K. > > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html