Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] was Hexanon now name spelling
From: Jeffery Smith <JLS@runbox.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 18:35:18 -0500
References: <B9A1793A.2D64%davidde@umich.edu> <003b01c25777$3fc58830$8ea4d33e@rob> <5.1.0.14.0.20020908170852.00b23ca0@pop.runbox.com>

Nope. More like naka-tish.

At 05:43 PM 9/8/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>I will try.  Pronounce as natch (as in naturally) ah (like open you mouth
>and say "ah") doe (as in lady deer) chess (as in chess game)  Fairly close?
>
>Don R.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jeffery Smith" <JLS@runbox.com>
>To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 5:10 PM
>Subject: Re: [Leica] was Hexanon now name spelling
>
>
> > How about trying to either spell it like it's pronounced, or pronounce it
> > like it's spelled? Is it spelled wrong and pronounced right, or pronounced
> > wrong and spelled right?
> >
> > JLS
> >
> > At 04:33 PM 9/8/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> > >Er.  Rob How should we be spelling Natchitoches, then?
> > >
> > >Sonny
> > >http://www.sonc.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Rob Appleby" <rob@robertappleby.com>
> > >To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> > >Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 3:35 PM
> > >Subject: Re: [Leica] 90/2.8 Hexanon
> > >
> > >
> > > > Davidde - shouldn't that be Davide (Italian)? Maybe my spelling's up
>the
> > > > creek this evening, though.
> > > > R.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Davidde A. Stella" <davidde@umich.edu>
> > > > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 10:01 PM
> > > > Subject: [Leica] 90/2.8 Hexanon
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I just finished a review of the 90/2.8 Hexanon M lens, if anyone is
> > > > > interested.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.davidde.com/konica90.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers!
> > > > >
> > > > > Davidde A. Stella
> > > > > -----
> > > > > http://www.davidde.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, see
>http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, see
>http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > >
> > >--
> > >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Davidde A. Stella" <davidde@umich.edu> ([Leica] 90/2.8 Hexanon)
Message from "Rob Appleby" <rob@robertappleby.com> (Re: [Leica] 90/2.8 Hexanon)
Message from Jeffery Smith <JLS@runbox.com> (Re: [Leica] was Hexanon now name spelling)