Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] A Number One reason why NOT to switch to digital
From: "Rob Appleby" <rob@robertappleby.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:15:45 +0200
References: <r01050300-0904-D2EC0D80CA2E11D6B5930D2FA4F95FB3@[64.1.0.23]>

I would have thought at that point the real limitation is the output device.

- -- Rob

http://www.robertappleby.com
Mobile: (+39) 348 336 7990
Home: (+39) 059 303436

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist@concentric.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] A Number One reason why NOT to switch to digital


> Dizelwebmaster@fucha.pl (Dizel)9/17/022:08 PM
>
> >I don't remember the source, but as far, as I remember, EOS D-60 can
record
> >about 6-7 f/stops contrast range.
>
> According to Stephen Johnson the BetterLight scanning back can record 11
stops. His work seems to demonstrate this. So as usual we find that each
system has its limitations. And also as usual the the magic happens when an
artist / cratfsperson understands the limitations and produces powerful work
within them.
>
> George
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from George Lottermoser <imagist@concentric.net> (Re: [Leica] A Number One reason why NOT to switch to digital)