Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] PAW wk38/sl
From: "Dizel" <webmaster@fucha.pl>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:46:09 +0200
References: <20020920132916.48D4E19C3E6@sashimi.toad.net>

> > Yes, certainly. i would say that for me this man at right is distracting -
> > grabs my eye away from her face. But it's just a MHO.. :)
> 
> Thanks for the comment Dizel. I seem to get this kind of comment quite a bit
> -- "...is distracting." Maybe it is just me, (because I took the picture?),
> but I find that the lady just jumps out at you from the picture. 

Yes :) The problem is that he is looking at me (at camera) and it is hard 
to ignore him - at lesat for me. Please make a following experiment:
put your hand on this photo and cover _whole_ left side. Now
you have a perfect, closed story :)

> Anyway, let me say it once again, my photography deliberately has
> "distractions". Generally one of my photos will have the main element (the
> lady) the secondary elements (the three men in the picture) and (the Green
> Party button and the George Bush picture). This all contributes to my style
> of "business" in a picture to make it more interesting.

Of course. Thats why I added MHO (my humble opinion) :) But your photo
I like most ( a front entrance one - http://www.streetphoto.net/images/homepic3a.jpg )
does not have any distractions. everything in it falls where it (IMEHO*)
should be :) Previous week one is also harmonious.. :)

*) in my extremely humble opinion :)
- --  
                                St.


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Dizel" <webmaster@fucha.pl> (Re: [Leica] PAW wk38/sl)
In reply to: Message from "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net> (Re: [Leica] PAW wk38/sl)