Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/10/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]C., > Yes, but remember you will be putting a teenage I don't believe we know she was a teenager. It was said she was a "young girl", and that can mean 20's, depending on how old you are. > mother in jail I don't believe anyone was suggesting jail. > ...all over a camera that has been returned. Hum. "returned". She was caught trying to pawn off stolen goods, and it was taken from her at that point in time. I guess it was returned in some sense of the word, but certainly NOT by her own doing. > Through the veil of distance, I have a feeling the cop/judge in > charge knew > exactly what they were doing when they processed the case. I wasn't aware the case had been "processed" to any end, as it was stated that the DA's office was "surprised that she'd only been given a ticket" given the value of the gear. So, the cop/judge etc. didn't have complete info apparently. The only thing that was relayed, as far as I read, was a "ticket" was issued...and she was remanded to "some sort of counseling program for treatment". Austin - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html