Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Rafael Alday wrote: > Thank you all for your advices. > I visited the www.cameraquest.com and Stephen Gandy says that Elmar is not > very sharp lens and Hektor chrome (coated) is not a very good lens (prone to > fogging). I have the posibility to buy a Late Canon 135 3.5 lens (not > senerar but later version) for 150 $ in mint condition. > Following Stephen Gandy recommendation the best 135mm SM lenses are Nikon > and Canon > Any experiences with this lens, Why do you want to buy a Screwmount-lens for your M6? The answers given to you were of course M-mount lenses... and even Stephen Gandy says things like "Outstanding performance, very popular, long lived lens" about the Tele-Elmar 4/135. I own one of these, and can't add anything to this statement... it is an outstanding, razor sharp and contrasty lens. Martin | Martin Jangowski E-Mail: Martin@Jangowski.de| | Netzwerke und Multimedia | | Voice: +49 7946/940790 Fax: +49 7946/940791 | | Snail Mail: Von-Olnhausen Str. 4 74626 Bretzfeld Germany | - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html