Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ah, but remember we're talking about the folks who brought back the "null series". 1970 is positively modern, compared to 1923! Bill Stanke bdcolen wrote: > > This is really wild..."If Leica was to re-release an outdated, outmoded > camera, what features would you want it to have?" ROFLOL! > > Why not ask "what features should they leave off again?" > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Douglas > Herr > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 4:10 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Reflex vs. RF > > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 15:14:39 -0500 Jeffrey Fass > <happy.eyeball@verizon.net> > wrote: > > > I can tell that, in working the deal with > > Minolta, Leica made a body with the soul of a > > consumer Japanese model, at least that's how it > > feels. > > Yup. > > > What's going on inside is a different story I'm > > sure. > > Nope. There are some internal differences between the R3-R7 series and > the Minolta counterparts, but these R bodies aren't as rugged as the > Leicaflexes or the R8/R9. > > Doug Herr<BR>Birdman of Sacramento<BR>http://www.wildlightphoto.com > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html