Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The Leica and Canon shots are all taken with wide-angle zooms. There is hardly *any* bokeh to talk of in those shots. While I tend to agree with your assessment of the three brands, there is little to no photographic evidence in favour of supporting that thesis in the three folders you present. In contrast, the Nikon shots are taken with normal or tele zooms at a tele-setting. A worthwhile comparison would have used lenses which are as *similar* to each other as possible -- as well as subject matter which is as similar to each other as possible. That said, I enjoyed looking at your photographs: a nice collection. If your intent was simply to announce them to us, then a simple message to that effect would have sufficed. M. On Sunday, Dec 8, 2002, at 08:09 America/Los_Angeles, Felix Lopez de Maturana wrote: > In my photonet workspace there are three folders that can help to > discern > about the difference among pictures taken with Canon, Leica and Nikon > as the > three folder have been shooted with cameras and lenses of the three > different brands. In my opinion the main difference is not in > sharpness or > distortion quite similar but in out of focus images that in Nikon case, > excellent images otherwise, is not very pleasant. Excuse me the > subject I've > chosen for the Nikon folder, rather sad... > > Kind regards > > Felix > > Leica : http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=250582 > Canon : http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=247399 > Nikon : http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=258636 > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html