Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Why fashion photography sucks--The Liberal hour
From: "Don R." <don.ro@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:51:37 -0600
References: <Springmail.0994.1041892582.0.55922600@webmail.atl.earthlink.net> <004001c2b5e4$a71d6e50$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8>

This is beginning to sound like the Liberal Hour or the conglomeration of
liberals.

Why not get back to Leica photography?
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Why fashion photography sucks


> Guess adds, the less pronounced contrast of
> > Calvin Klein adds, hell, even adds for Victoria Secret.  They all
produce
> some
> > image that is possessed of a certain degree of perfectness - even if it
is
> a
> > "heroin chic."  That being said, it's the um.  Just my $.02.
> >
> > Frank
> Victoria secret?
> Heidi Klumm
> "marianne"(forgot her name(from corsica))
> all supermodels of today
> simon
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] Why fashion photography sucks--The Liberal hour)
Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Why fashion photography sucks--The Liberal hour)
In reply to: Message from "Frank Farmer"<frankandaubrey@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] Why fashion photography sucks)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] Why fashion photography sucks)