Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]John Collier writes: > As there was a 1.5/85 Summarex (some early ones marked 1.5/90) may be the > catalogue writers made a mistake. > > John Collier I suspect you are correct. The Summarex was an expensive piece of glass in its day, and has a "finger-print", which I rather like. Sort of "glow" when used wide open, especially noted on colour film. Cheers Alastair Firkin @ work ;-) http://www.afirkin.com http://www.familyofman2.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html