Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/01/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 06:18:52 +0100
References: <20030122145753.GA6119@panix.com> <5.1.1.6.0.20030122104236.009f36a0@pop-server.twcny.rr.com> <20030122164458.GC6119@panix.com> <3E2F87DD.5010908@webshuttle.ch> <008f01c2c33c$59729210$0200a8c0@c439786a> <OE34TjKVS2vUtqbPCRO000181bf@hotmail.com>
Eric,
I rate it at 1600.
Nathan
faneuil wrote:
> Bit confused with the neopan thread.
>
> So is rating it at 800-1200 a good thing?
>
> I have a lab do my developing.
> If I shoot it at 800 should I tell them to 'pull' it?
>
> Eric
>
- --
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland
e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
mobile: +41 78 732 1430
Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2002.htm
General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)
In reply to:
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> ([Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Ernest Nitka <enitka@twcny.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> ([Leica] Re: Noepan 1600 (WAS: niagra falls))
Message from "Phil Leeson" <pjleeson@mchsi.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)
Message from "faneuil" <leica_korenman@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Neopan 1600)