Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Does this mean we can't talk about Leicas?????
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 15:33:40 -0500

You can get the full draft legislation here...
http://www.public-i.org/dtaweb/report.asp?ReportID=502&L1=10&L2=10&L3=0&
L4=0&L5=0

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Tim
Atherton
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:05 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] Does this mean we can't talk about Leicas?????


Hmmm... that would be funny if it weren't so close tot the truth.

This maybe a salon premium story, but you'll get the gist

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/02/11/patriot_act/index.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Kelly
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:27 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: [Leica] Does this mean we can't talk about Leicas?????
> 
> 
> 
>  Department of Homeland Security
> "For a Safe and Secure NationT"
>  
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Clampdown on Internet Subversives
> - President says "we must stop this evil spread of ideas"
> 
>  Washington 2/5/03
> 
>  
> 
> 
> In a far reaching announcement today, President Bush announced that an

> imminent clampdown into the dissemination of subversive and dangerous 
> ideas via the Internet.
> 
> Announcing this new initiative alongside director Tom Ridge, the 
> president said: "We must stop this evil spread of ideas. Far too many 
> people are being exposed to thoughts and concepts that challenge those

> things this administration stands for. The Internet is clearly an 
> example of outmoded liberal ideas gone badly out of control."
> 
> Director Ridge added: "It is unfair for the federal government to pass

> the burden of this onto tax-payers and citizens. Instead, we are 
> proposing that the cost be shared between web site publishers and 
> those minority of the population who visit such things. Screening this

> information is expensive and those costs must be passed on."
> 
> The proposed charges will be in the region of $100 per web page to be 
> analysed for content and 10 cents per page viewed by visitors, this 
> charge will go towards an upgrade to the Carnivore systems already in 
> place. Sites belonging to government agencies are exempt, as are sites

> belong to Fortune 500 companies - Director Ridge said "We can trust 
> major corporations to always act in the interests of the United 
> States, so we do not propose to screen their content. However, in the 
> current climate of terrorist threats we must consider everyone else to

> be a potential subversive".
> 
> Charges will be levied after 31st March 2003. For any queries or 
> comments, please contact our press office.
> 
> This article is http://www.homelandsecurity.gov@subj.com/dhs/
>   
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see 
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Does this mean we can't talk about Leicas?????)