Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] The Wall Street JOURNAL and Jim Hemenway
From: Marc James Small <msmall@infi.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 19:43:59 -0500
References: <00a601c2d6c0$a15851e0$0316fea9@ccasony01> <3.0.2.32.20030217181021.01a05b24@roanoke.infi.net>

At 07:09 PM 2/17/03 -0500, Jim Hemenway wrote:
>
>Why can't you Libertarians get serious?  Always kidding around!

YOU were kidding?  Sorry, Jim.  I now realize that you LIKE the statist
editorial approach of the Wall Street Journal.  But, then, doesn't Liberal
= Statist?  That is, aren't Liberals always looking to the State to cure
societal woes, where a conservative trusts society to be capable of
handling such on its own?

<he grins>

Marc

msmall@infi.net  FAX:  +276/343-7315
Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir!

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] The Wall Street JOURNAL and a country lawyer :))
Reply from Marc James Small <msmall@infi.net> (RE: [Leica] The Wall Street JOURNAL and Jim Hemenway)
In reply to: Message from "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] FS: Special Anti-War Protest edition Leica M7)
Message from Marc James Small <msmall@infi.net> ([Leica] The Wall Street JOURNAL and Jim Hemenway)