Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Let me reiterate yet again that Erwin's report WAS NEVER POSTED HERE. The chap who posted it to HIS OWN site posted the link to several Leica boards but not to this list. The link was merely noted on this list. Here is the site where it was posted: http://www.stevehoffman.tv/ If you have problems with Erwin's report being posted to the internet then take it up with the chap who did it. It has absolutely nothing to do with this list! John Collier On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 07:52 AM, Dennis Painter wrote: > To me the posting of a copyrighted, private email was a question of > ethics, > not whether someone was "bad". > > "Fascinating" seeing your posts on this as compared to your posts when > you > see another ethical question that you call "conflict of interest". It > would > seem our ethical beliefs differ but that is understandable. > > As to Erwin Puts' writing as it is now posted on his website his > assessment > can be discussed if you chose. > > Dennis > > > bdcolen wrote: > >> Fascinating the entire thread about Erwin and the MP was devoted to >> how >> and why what he wrote got posted to the LUG, and whether someone's >> doing >> so made them a bad person - rather than to Mr. Puts' assessment of the >> camera. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html