Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Erwin Put's Essay on the MP
From: Slobodan Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 14:42:22 -0800
References: <BA893B2E.1F227%alexpix@worldnet.att.net>

Never forget the ephemeral qualities of one's reputation, and its
possible besmirchment, that can be caused by the unauthorized usage.
Slobodan Dimitrov

Steven Alexander wrote:
> 
> on 3/3/03 2:24 PM, Austin Franklin at darkroom@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> 
> >
> > Jerry,
> >
> > I believe monetary benefit is one of the things that is crucial to any
> > action for copyright violations.  It doesn't mean whether there was or
> > wasn't, but it's really hard to fuss about someone causing you "harm" if you
> > can't substantiate any monetary damage.  Harm because you don't like it, and
> > it upsets you, or it may get you in trouble with Leica doesn't usually
> > count.  Malice may, but I doubt this was posted with malice.
> >
> > Austin
> >
> If it is registered with the Copyright Office statutory penalties would
> apply, of course no action would be taken without establishing financial
> loss.
> 
> Happy snaps,
> Steven Alexander
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Steven Alexander <alexpix@worldnet.att.net> (Re: [Leica] Erwin Put's Essay on the MP)