Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 21mm Skopar opinion(s) please
From: Slobodan Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 07:24:09 -0800
References: <PPEIILNAKKDNOLGFLICLEEMHDKAA.edseas2@shore.net> <OE66J8MqU2xERMsrZnd00001c60@hotmail.com> <3E65532F.EC009F40@rabinergroup.com> <p05100304ba8b0b34f1e8@[209.53.33.241]> <3E65896F.C101B763@earthlink.net> <005d01c2e315$85096900$356ef7a5@mindspring.com>

No, I was just realigning my set up. Since I was given the word, from
higher up, that I could acquire other lenses only by selling ones not
used for making money, I acquiesced.
I'm noticing a different coating on the new C/V lenses. I wonder if
that's to take care of the line's original weakness in the micro
contrast area?
Slobodan Dimitrov

Gary Williams wrote:
> 
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 21mm Skopar opinion(s) please
> 
> > The 21 Skopar is a fine lens, and one I was sorry to see go.
> 
> > Slobodan Dimitrov
> 
> Sorry to see go?   Is Voigtlander out of the game?
> 
> Gary
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Fred Sears" <edseas2@shore.net> ([Leica] 21mm Skopar opinion(s) please)
Message from "Seth Rosner" <sethrosner1@msn.com> (Re: [Leica] 21mm Skopar opinion(s) please)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] 21mm Skopar opinion(s) please)
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] 21mm Skopar opinion(s) please)
Message from Slobodan Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] 21mm Skopar opinion(s) please)
Message from "Gary Williams" <nasmformyzombie@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] 21mm Skopar opinion(s) please)