Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] fired for photoshopping
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 18:48:46 -0800
References: <02e601c2f968$8b33ad90$0316fea9@ccasony01> <5.2.0.9.2.20030402203224.00b055a8@mail.infoave.net>

Tina

I am surprised that none of the apologists noted that while
making excuses for his action.

When I saw the 3 pics, I said, "No wonder they fired his ass".

Jerry

Tina Manley wrote:

> At 03:49 PM 4/2/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >BTW, if you actually saw the images ( LA Times today, page A6) you would
> >notice that the actual changes made did not change the intent or message of
> >the photo.  It improved the image.
>
> I totally disagree.  It changed the entire intent of the photo.  In the
> original two photos, the soldier is not pointing a weapon at the father
> carrying the child.  In the composite photo he is.  The difference in the
> two photos is astounding to me.
>
> Tina
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> http://www.tinamanley.com
>
> photos available from:
> http://www.pdiphotos.com
> http://www.mira.com
> http://www.agpix.com
> http://www.newscom.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] fired for photoshopping)
Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (RE: [Leica] fired for photoshopping)