Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] fired for photoshopping
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 10:06:00 -0800
References: <20030403161007.36408.qmail@web21405.mail.yahoo.com>

Henry

To paraphrase what Tina said; the altered photo is inflammatory,
the components of it are not.

Jerry

Henry Ting wrote:

> I agree, reprimand would be more appropriate. However,
> firing the photography AND then PUBLICIZING it, makes
> me wonder whether LA Times is using the opportunity
> for some self-publicity. For one thing, the "firing"
> of the photography might or might not be correct, but
> making it into news in itself have no basis.
> Especially, there's other more newsworthy war stories.
> The way I look at it, LA times couldn't care less if
> this had happened during times of peace, and the
> reason ? -- who would care. I still think the
> photography in this case is a scape-goat from some
> self-righteous bigwig who saw a perfect opportunity
> for some other self-promotion.
>
> --- Frank Filippone <red735i@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > But BD, the comment I made was that this is
> > precisely what written word
> > journalists do.....  why 2 standards?  Is it beacuse
> > you are a photographer
> > that the standards are different, and more robust
> > for the photographer?  Why
> > is it not OK that the paper would publish a 1 side
> > point of view on the War
> > itself?  Omission is OK but commission is a sin?
> >
> > I think the comments about the power of the paper to
> > influence, is one that
> > we all accept.  They do this through selective
> > reporting, and I believe is
> > an editorial driven point of view.   I think I
> > accept that the
> > photojournalist is entitled to the same standards,
> > and thus my opinion that
> > his work was acceptable as it did not in my opinion
> > and in my memory, not
> > change the .meaning of the point of time.
> >
> > BTW, I do believe that for breaking the rules of the
> > LA Times, the guy
> > should have been reprimanded.  FIred?  Maybe, if it
> > so states in the rule
> > book.
> >
> > Frank Filippone
> > red735i@earthlink.net
> >
> >
> > What is with you folks? Unacceptable to say 'submit
> > only those photos
> > that you exposed, and none of those that you
> > composed?'
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
> http://tax.yahoo.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Henry Ting <henryting10@yahoo.com> (RE: [Leica] fired for photoshopping)