Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Jazz Fest, Natchitoches
From: "\(SonC\) Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 23:19:41 -0600
References: <000201c2fbf5$ebf05270$0100a8c0@hal>

> Sonny,
>
> One wonders about the correlation between the "cheapness" of the digital
> frame and one's sense of the value of an image.  Profligacy and quality
> are not "equivalent," in a Minor White sort of sense.
>
> Cheers,
>
> C
Chandos,
Huh?   My degree is English, but  I had to go to the Dictionary for that
one. (see below for a definition, if you are not an English major)  I shot
probably the same number of exposures I would have in film for such an
event.  I culled the shots, and one stood out.   I shared it, because I
thought it showed a capability of digital that no one else has shared.   If
it were a good shot, despite the digital-ness of it, I might have posted
without comment to the camera source. However, it shows a capability that I
was not aware of until my camera delivered the image.

AND, I did not have to process the film.  I did not have to scan the film.
I did not have to worry about the noise of the scanner.  Judge the shot by
Minor White standards?  hmmm, why not by  Minor Wisdom (also an English
major) standards?

S.


Main Entry: 1prof·li·gate
Pronunciation: 'prä-fli-g&t, -"gAt
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin profligatus, from past participle of profligare to strike
down, from pro- forward, down + -fligare (akin to fligere to strike); akin
to Greek phlibein to squeeze
Date: 1647
1 : completely given up to dissipation and licentiousness
2 : wildly extravagant : PRODIGAL
- - prof·li·gate·ly adverb


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Chandos Michael Brown" <cmbrow@wm.edu>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 10:35 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Jazz Fest, Natchitoches


> Sonny,
>
> One wonders about the correlation between the "cheapness" of the digital
> frame and one's sense of the value of an image.  Profligacy and quality
> are not "equivalent," in a Minor White sort of sense.
>
> Cheers,
>
> C
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of (SonC)
> Sonny Carter
> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 10:54 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: [Leica] Jazz Fest, Natchitoches
>
> Walking home from the Jazz and Blues Festival tonight, I looked back and
> saw
> this view.
>
> f2 @ 1 sec.   Lumix / Leica digital
>
> http://www.sonc.com/jazzfest_2003.htm
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> SonC  (Sonny Carter)
> http://www.sonc.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Chandos Michael Brown" <cmbrow@wm.edu> (RE: [Leica] Jazz Fest, Natchitoches)