Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Incident vs. Reflective Metering
From: Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:00:21 -0700
References: <BAY1-F104S4qm5qjlbC00005cc4@hotmail.com>

>Just read with interest the comments on relfective versus incident 
>light reading/metering. Having been a long time believer in hand 
>held meters I just would like to throw my experiences into the pot.
>For starters, if you have never tried or are skeptical of the value 
>of incident  vs reflective, try this. Beg or borrow a decent 
>*calibrated* hand held meter. Arm your self with your camera with 
>its built-in reflective meter. Go out and photograph a number of 
>different color and substance items; dark wood, shiny metal, you get 
>the idea. Expose two shots, one with the in camera meter and then 
>the incident meter, pointed toward the camera in the same spot as 
>the subject. Now the beauty of incident metering is you don't have 
>to be in the exact same spot. Just a location that has the same 
>amount of light falling on the location as the subject. Experiment 
>number 2; take a reading from both the subject's location and a 
>separate location. This would be done assuming you could not get 
>close to the intended subject. Compare the readings. They will be 
>the same. To address the issue of the black cat and the white on 
>white dress or the sands at White Sands National Monument. An 
>incident meter reading will give an accurate exposure, leaving the 
>cat black and the dress white and White Sands (not really sand) a 
>rendition of what you saw. Would you bracket? Maybe. Remember the 
>basic rule of all built-in reflective meters, they're calibrated to 
>18% greyscale, like a greyscale card. Black will be grey, snow will 
>be grey, a white dress will be grey. The main thing is experiment 
>and see for yourself the difference in reading variations, shooting 
>the same subject. I have 3 hand helds, and use them no matter what 
>system I'm shooting that day; EOS, 3s, EOS 1N RS, Nikon FE, Leica 
>M6s TTL or my Pentax 67s even though they have TTL prisms (for macro 
>work)and my Yashica Mat 124 when I want to shoot square. If you 
>don't have a hand held, at least get a small grey card to carry and 
>meter off of that in difficult situations.
>I shoot almost exclusively chromes and they leave little room for 
>metering error.    Dave

Not exactly handheld, but the Sinarsix system does the metering 
right; handheld meters are just 'waving your hand at the scenery'. 
Spot metering with the spot always in the right place. Helps you when 
each shot costs $12+.

Action shots are optional.

- -- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Dave Olson" <ckrosebud@hotmail.com> ([Leica] Incident vs. Reflective Metering)