Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] replace supra with ___?
From: "Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:04:52 +0100
References: <BB15616F.10F0E%simon@sclamb.com> <3EEFA770.C9475ED0@pacbell.net>

Sorry, not my image.  But I agree about the colours.

Simon

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerry Lehrer" <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 12:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] replace supra with ___?


> Simon
>
> Poster-like colors.  Is that child wearing makeup?
>
> Jerry
>
> Simon Lamb wrote:
>
> > You could also try the new Kodak High Definition 200 film.  It produces
very
> > accurate colours, especially skin tones, is very sharp, no visible grain
and
> > scans beautifully, should you wish to scan your negs.  The prints I have
had
> > back from the lab are excellent.
> >
> > The Velvia 100 is an addition to the 50 for saturated colours, not a
> > replacement for the Provia 100F.
> >
> > Here is a link to  Velvia 100 image:
> >
> > http://www.leica-camera.com/discus_e/messages/11/23392.html?1055383380
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > On 17/6/03 23:10, "Frank Farmer" <frankandaubrey@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Mark,
> > >
> > > I think Kodak recommends that you replace Supra with Portra.  But if
the grain
> > > bothers you I'd try the new Agfa Ultra in 100.  I have heard good
things about
> > > that film.  Have you tried the Portra 400UC?
> > >
> > > Frank
> > > -------Original Message-------
> > > From: "Mark J. Rosen" <mjr@grok.org>
> > > Sent: 06/17/03 02:54 PM
> > > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > > Subject: [Leica] replace supra with ___?
> > >
> > >>
> > >> I've been using kodak supra 100 and 400 for a while now, and I stil
have a
> > > dozen rolls or so of each in the refrigerator.  I've gotten good
results
> > > with Reala, though on overcast days it's not particularly satisfying.
The
> > > supra 100 was my regular film, and with its recent demise, I'm not
sure
> > > what
> > > to replace it with as my standard 100 speed film.  I've tried the
Portra
> > > 160vc, but found it much grainier than the supra.  I saw a box of Fuji
> > > Press
> > > 100 in my local camera store, but I didn't even know they made it in
that
> > > speed.  Anybody try this film?  Any other recommendations?
> > >
> > > As for 400 speed, I mainly used the supra, but I've also tried both
Portra
> > > 400vc and 400nc with mixed results.  I still like the supra better.  I
> > > haven't yet tried the Fuji Press 400.  Anyone like to comment on this
> > > film,
> > > in terms of grain, saturation, contrast, suitability for sunny and/or
> > > cloudy, etc.
> > >
> > > In the meantime, I'm trying to save the supra I have for important
events
> > > where I know I'd want to use it.  But I need to find a new mainstay
soon.
> > > Really soon.
> > >
> > > On the slide front, I read recently about Fuji coming out with Velvia
> > > 100F.
> > > Is this supposed to replace the 50, or replace the Provia 100F, or
just be
> > > an additional, but faster, velvia?
> > >
> > > Thanks for any help.
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Simon Lamb <simon@sclamb.com> (Re: [Leica] replace supra with ___?)
Message from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] replace supra with ___?)