Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 135mm lens discussion
From: "\(SonC\) Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 20:06:56 -0500
References: <000001c348d8$db6a2bd0$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4>

Methinks the wrong URL?



- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com>
To: <Leica-Users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 7:51 PM
Subject: [Leica] 135mm lens discussion


> With all the comment back and forth about 135mm lenses, I thought I
> would ground the discussion in images or at least an image.  The below
> image was shot with a 135 Canon Serenar, a kissing cousin to the 135
> Sonnar and the Soviet Jupiter design.
> 
> In the original image you can see the beads of sweat coming off this
> hard working athlete.  The set up to the image is this runner is about
> number eight of the women runners.  Number nine is right behind her just
> out of frame.  She is sprinting as hard as she can for about another 300
> meters to the finish line of a 10K run.
> 
> Pretty good work for an M3, 1.25X viewfinder, and a fifty year old lens.
> Truly, unless 135 is one of your go to focal lengths, then any of the
> Sonnar designs can provide outstanding performance for around $100 US.
> 
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1611484&size=lg
> 
> Now in plain text for the LUG.
> 
> Don
> dorysrus@mindspring.com
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> ([Leica] 135mm lens discussion)