Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]<<<<Since this is essentially an M list, I would assume>>>> There are at least a dozen of us using a unique line of cameras, Leica made, called the "R Series." Randy www.randyjensenphoto.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Afterswift@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:21 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] squabbling over digitial vs. film. In a message dated 8/5/03 8:17:09 AM, telyt@earthlink.net writes: << The endless squabbling over digital vs. film seems pointless to me. Each has its strengths and weaknesses; digital is 'good enough' for some purposes. For those who feel that settling for 'good enough' cheapens the craft, remember that 35mm doesn't provide the image quality of 4x5 or medium format but is good enough for many purposes. Good enough is just what it means: good enough. It's all we need. >> I think the upshot of all this is that we've inherited a two-track mode of photography. We need to be competent in both. Since this is essentially an M list, I would assume that film is the rail we essentially run on. br - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html