Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Re: [Leica] squabbling over digitial vs. film.
From: feli2@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 17:37:46 -0700 (GMT)

- -------Original Message-------
From: Martin Howard <mvhoward@mac.com>

>You don't need to be a practitioner to be a good critic of >something.   

Correct, but it does help if you know what you are talking about.

>Alternatively, if you don't agree with that, please show us >yourportfolio that matches Sebastiao Salgado and Zhou Hai that >allows you  to make the judgement that one is great, while the >other merely good... 
>;)M.


I'm not a big fan of pulling out my resume, but regardless here's a run down. I have worked for Digital Domain for nearly 10 years on the fx teams for films like Apollo 13, True Lies, Interview with the Vampire, The Grinch Who Stole Xmas, Terminator 2/3D, Titanic etc. I was the compositing supervisor (digital optical printing) on Red Planet and Vanila Sky and have won a few awards like a Clio for the theatrical spot for Adidas with the Mechanical Legs playing imaginary basketball. The last thing I did was a theatrical Nike spot that ran this July. It was called Speed Chain and featured a "relay" race between a runner, horse, train etc.The last two were directed by David Fincher and ran on something like 6000-8000 screens in the US.

So, although I am not a world famous director (only a few unknown shorts), I do have a good grasp on the technology and a track record to be able to make the comment that HD is not really a replacement for film, regardless of what Rodrigues says.

Cheers,

feli
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@charter.net> (Re: Re: [Leica] squabbling over digitial vs. film.)