Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] More on lag measurement
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 05:29:07 -0700
References: <D1258ED0-CA0E-11D7-8195-000393802534@mac.com> <008601c35e26$e9082860$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net> <3F34CEB4.2E3F6B26@sympatico.ca>

frank theriault said:

>>> So, back to lag times - they aren't important, except perhaps as in
indication
> that a camera is a well-engineered and assembled instrument.  They are the
> ~result~ of a good camera, and should not in and of themselves be the
target of
> designers.<<

Damn I love it when it's explained in a manner an ordinary guy can
understand.
thanks Frank.
ted



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from frank theriault <knarf.theriault@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] More on lag measurement)
In reply to: Message from Martin Howard <mvhoward@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] More on lag measurement)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] More on lag measurement)
Message from frank theriault <knarf.theriault@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] More on lag measurement)