Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/08/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Glass vs. Glassless Neg. Carriers...
From: "Jon" <jon.stanton@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:04:46 -0700
References: <BCEKKGNGDPMOIPMEJONBGECKCJAA.phong@doan-ltd.com> <002d01c368a3$cc3aa820$db249d18@jimyuk06mzqas1> <3F460C79.D4AF2BB9@transbay.net> <48AEDE75.4FCDD76E@hale-pohaku.com> <01b001c368c8$0c6e50d0$6401a8c0@lan.artvader.com> <48B0AF4A.B437895B@hale-pohaku.com>
" Anyone tried those HEPA room air filters, Honeywell's seems to be the
major
player in this?"
"Jon wrote:
I have the Honeywell running right now. Sears usually has them on sale."
"Well, notice any difference with dust on negs, etc? TIA Dennis"
Actually I have not done my own processing in about 30 years. I have however
just acquired a Focomat enlarger, so I will be back at it. The Hepa is
primarily for airborne allergens. The visible airborne dust disappears.
Jon
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from tripspud <tripspud@transbay.net> (Re: [Leica] Re:Glass vs. Glassless Neg. Carriers...)
In reply to:
Message from "Phong" <phong@doan-ltd.com> (RE: [Leica] New PAWs (2 images))
Message from "Jim McIntyre" <mcintyre@ca.inter.net> (Re: [Leica] New PAWs (2 images))
Message from tripspud <tripspud@transbay.net> ([Leica] Re:Glass vs. Glassless Neg. Carriers...)
Message from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> (Re: [Leica] Re:Glass vs. Glassless Neg. Carriers...)
Message from "Jon" <jon.stanton@comcast.net> (Re: [Leica] Re:Glass vs. Glassless Neg. Carriers...)
Message from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> (Re: [Leica] Re:Glass vs. Glassless Neg. Carriers...)