Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree. I've been using the original "fat" version of the 90/2.8 Tele-Elmarit doing theatre photography, always wide open. I've liked the results. Good contrast even wide open. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Young" <dnr@horizon.bc.ca> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 3:59 PM Subject: [Leica] Re: Leica 90mm f/4.0 Elmar C prices > At 8/24/2003, you wrote: > > >At least with the 90-C you won't be tempted to use the unusable 2.8f of the > >Tele-Elmarit. > >Slobodan Dimitrov > > > Where did you hear this, Slobodan? > > I used the Tele-Elmarit for about 5 years, with excellent success - and I > mostly shoot wide open! Especially with Elmars and Elmarits! :) > > Recently, I've been sorting 40 years worth of slides (should have done it > years ago!) and have been viewing many of my old Tele-Elmarit chromes. I > still see nothing wrong with them! > > So why do you say that f2.8 is unusable on the Tele-Elmarit? > ---------- > > David Young, | égalité, liberté, > Victoria, CANADA | fraternité et Beaujolais. > > Website at: www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html